EFFECTIVE: July 1, 1998
RETITLED: September 14, 2000
RETITLED: August 25, 2001
REVISED: April 20, 2011
REVISED: May 9, 2012
REVISED: July 11, 2013
REVISED: January 20, 2015
REFERENCES: Board Policy 4-31; SP 4-31a
/ Nancy J. McCallin /
Nancy J. McCallin, Ph.D.
The procedure applies to students within the Colorado Community College System (CCCS).
This Student Grievance Procedure is intended to allow students an opportunity to present an issue which they feel warrants action, including the right to secure educational benefits and services.
If the basis of the claim is discrimination and/ or harassment based on federal or state civil rights laws, the student must file a grievance under the Civil Rights Grievance and Investigation Process. If the accused (Respondent) is a student, please refer to SP 4-31a. If the Respondent is a CCCS Administrator/Professional Technical employee(s), Faculty or Adjunct Instructor(s), Classified employee(s), hourly employee(s), which would include student hourlys and workstudys (CCCS employee(s)), authorized volunteer(s), guest(s) or visitor(s), please refer to SP 3-50b.
Chief Student Services Officer (CSSO) is the College employee designated by the College President to administer student grievances. The CSSO may delegate the responsibility over student grievances to another person.
Complainant(s) is a person who is subject to alleged inequity as it applies to Board Policies, System President’s Procedures, or College Procedures. For purposes of this procedure, a Complainant(s) is a student who was enrolled at the time of the alleged incident.
Day refers to calendar day unless otherwise noted below.
A grievable offense is any alleged action which violates or inequitably applies State Board Policies, System President’s Procedures, and College Procedures. The Complainant must be personally affected by such violation or inequitable action.
The following matters are not grievable under this procedure except as noted:
Notices which are required to be given by this procedure shall be considered served when given by personal delivery, mailing by certified mail, or emailing the parties to their official college email address requesting a delivery receipt notification. If notice is mailed, the parties shall be given three (3) additional days to respond.
Respondent(s) is a person whose alleged conduct is the subject of a complaint. For purposes of this procedure, a Respondent can be a CCCS employee(s), student(s) who was enrolled at the time of the alleged incident, authorized volunteer(s), guest(s), visitor(s), or College.
All complaints shall be made as promptly as possible after the occurrence. A delay in reporting may be reasonable under some circumstances; however, an unreasonable delay in reporting is an appropriate consideration in evaluating the merits of a complaint or report.
Students must timely submit all grievances in writing (See Appendix) to the CSSO. The grievance should clearly and concisely describe the alleged incident(s), when and where it occurred, and the desired remedy sought. The grievance should be signed by the initiator or, in the case of an email submission, sent as an email attachment, in letter format and should contain the name and all contact information for the grievant. Any supporting documentation and evidence should be referenced within the body of the formal grievance. Additionally, the initiator of a formal grievance should submit any supporting materials in writing as quickly as is practicable.
The Complainant’s supporting documentation should clearly demonstrate all informal efforts, if any, to resolve the issue(s) with the person involved and the person’s supervisor. This includes names, dates and times of attempted or actual contact along with a description of the discussion and the manner of communication made in the course of each effort. If contacting the person involved and/or the supervisor is impracticable, the Complainant should state the reasons why.
The CSSO shall initially determine whether the complaint is grievable or non-grievable.
Complainant is encouraged to resolve the issue with the Respondent through the informal process. The CSSO shall facilitate the informal process. If the informal grievance process is unsuccessful, or if the College or the Complainant chooses not to pursue the informal process, the CSSO will open a formal grievance case.
The CSSO will contact or request a meeting with both the Complainant and Respondent. Both parties will be given the opportunity to discuss the allegations of the grievance and may offer any documentation, witnesses, or other materials in support of the complaint.
The CSSO may also contact or request a meeting with relevant college staff, students, or others as part of the investigation.
At the CSSO’s discretion, he/she may discontinue meetings with anyone that is causing disruption, and will proceed to make a determination based on the information known at that time.
The Complainant(s) and the Respondent(s) have the opportunity to be advised by a personal advisor of their choice, at their expense, at any stage of the process and to be accompanied by that advisor at any meeting or hearing.
An advisor may only consult and advise his or her advisee, but not speak for the advisee at any meeting or hearing. These procedures are entirely administrative in nature and are not considered legal proceedings. The CSSO may remove or dismiss an advisor who becomes disruptive or who does not abide by the restrictions on their participation.
The Colleges, at its discretion, may audio or video record any meeting throughout the process. No other audio or video recording will be allowed.
Based on the preponderance of evidence, the CSSO shall issue a decision, in writing, to both the Complainant and Respondent. The decision shall reject or grant the grievance and make recommendation(s) to resolve the issue(s). The Complainant and Respondent shall be advised of his/her right to appeal the decision, subject to the grounds below, by filing a written appeal with the CSSO within seven (7) days of service of the decision.
In the event of an appeal, the CSSO shall give written notice to the other party to allow him/her the opportunity to submit a response in writing. The CSSO will also draft a response memorandum (also shared with all parties). All appeals and responses are then forwarded to the appeals officer or committee for initial review to determine if the appeal meets the limited grounds and is timely. The original finding will stand if the appeal is not timely or substantively eligible, and the decision is final. The party requesting appeal must show error as the original finding is presumed to have been decided reasonably and appropriately. The ONLY grounds for appeal are as follows:
If the appeals officer or committee determines that new evidence should be considered, it will return the complaint to the CSSO to reconsider in light of the new evidence, only.
If the appeals officer or committee determines that a material procedural or substantive error occurred, it may return the complaint to the CSSO with instructions to reconvene the hearing to cure the error. In rare cases, where the procedural or substantive error cannot be cured by the CSSO in cases of bias, the appeals officer or committee may order a new hearing be held by a different individual acting in the place of the designated CSSO. The results of a reconvened hearing cannot be appealed. The results of a new hearing can be appealed, once, on the two applicable grounds for appeals.
If any person who files a grievance, or any person who testifies, assists or participates in a proceeding, investigation or hearing relating to such grievance, feels they are being subjected to retaliatory acts may report such incidences to the CSSO.
It is a violation of the grievance procedure to engage in retaliatory acts against any person who files a grievance or any person who testifies, assists or participates in the grievance proceeding, investigation or hearing relating to such grievance. Such act will be subject to discipline, up to and including expulsion for students, termination for CCCS employees, and dismissal for authorized volunteers, guests or visitors.
CCCS reserves the right to change any provision or requirement of this procedure at any time and the change shall become effective immediately.
If you believe that you have been subjected to alleged inequity as it applies to Board Policies, System President’s Procedures, or College Procedures, you are required to fill out this incident report form. The College can only base its decision and take actions based on the information provided by you. If more space is necessary, please continue your comments on the back of this form, or on a separate sheet of paper.
Date of Incident:
Name(s) of who you believe committed the alleged act(s) (Respondent):
Is person an employee, student, authorized volunteer, guest/visitor, or college?
Check One: Employee____ Student____ Authorized Volunteer ____Guest/Visitor ____ College____
Please describe the alleged incident(s), and when and where it occurred. Also, please attach any supporting documentation and evidence.
Identify all individuals with knowledge of the conduct about which you are complaining.
We highly encourage attempting to resolve complaints informally. Would you be interested in attempting this process? Check one: Yes____ No____
Please describe your requested remedy for this grievance.
To investigate your grievance, it will be necessary to interview you, the alleged Respondent, and any witnesses with knowledge of the allegations or defenses. The statements and the information that you are providing may be attributed to you and could be included in any grievance reports that are prepared.
Authorization to disclose identity of Complainant: Yes No
*Please note limiting the college’s ability to disclose will affect the college’s ability to respond to the grievance.
Please provide your contact information
Alternate Phone Number:
I, _____________________________, am willing to cooperate fully in the investigation of my grievance and provide whatever evidence the College deems relevant. I affirm that the information I am providing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I understand that my statements and the information that I am providing may be attributed to me and could be included in any investigation reports that are prepared. I also understand that this investigation is confidential and for me to disclose any information that I have obtained during the course of this investigation could interfere with the investigation. Further, I understand that discussing this investigation with Non-College Officials could expose me to civil liability under current defamation law. I also understand that if I do not fully cooperate, decisions will be made based on the best information available to the College.
I, ______________________, understand that my complaint constitutes an “educational record” as defined by the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974 (FERPA). As such I authorize the College to disclose my name and/or the specific allegation(s) made by me to the Respondent of said allegation(s) and to others identified as material witnesses during the course of this investigation. Other than the aforementioned, I understand that I retain all other rights afforded to me under FERPA.